hujah amanah = 诚信论据

题目要求为归还失物提供完整论证。先找明确行动，再检查是否说明权利或责任，并提出可核查的后续步骤。个人喜好或隐瞒都不能支持诚信。

例子： 可连接失主权益、交给负责人和记录发现地点三项内容。

argument about trust = hujah amanah

The item asks for a complete argument about handling found property. Look for a clear action, a reason based on rights or responsibility, and a verifiable follow-up step. Personal preference or concealment cannot support integrity.

Example: A sound argument can connect the owner’s right, handing the item to a responsible person, and recording where it was found.

tafsir integriti = 解读诚信

题目要从“承认并修正错误”推断人物品格。先看行动是否保护资料准确和承担责任，再排除与材料相反的解释。承认错误本身不是软弱，而是诚信证据。

例子： 主动更正报告显示负责人愿意承担后果，并让别人获得准确资料。

interpret integrity = tafsir integriti

The question asks what can be inferred from admitting and correcting a calculation error. Check whether the action protects accuracy and accepts responsibility, then reject interpretations that contradict the material. Admitting an error is evidence of integrity rather than weakness.

Example: Correcting the report voluntarily shows willingness to accept consequences and provide accurate information to others.

cadangan sistematik = 系统性建议

题目要求减少迟还问题，建议应包含记录、提醒和方便执行的归还流程。先判断方案是否解决原因并能持续使用；完全取消资源并不是改善管理。

例子： 可记录借还日期、提前提醒，并设置清楚归还点，让责任容易追踪。

systematic suggestion = cadangan sistematik

The item asks for a practical system to reduce late returns. A useful proposal combines a record, a reminder, and a clear return process that can be used consistently. Removing all access does not improve responsible management.

Example: Record borrowing dates, send a reminder one day early, and provide a clearly marked return point so responsibility can be tracked.

rumusan bersama = 共同总结

题目要综合三个群体的共同做法。找出反复出现的核心概念，即诚实分担责任和合作，而不是挑选一个无关视觉细节。总结应覆盖全部资料，不夸大单一人物。

例子： 学生、教师与家长都参与，可总结诚信是各方共同实践的责任。

shared summary = rumusan bersama

The question asks for the common message across students, teachers, and parents. Identify the repeated idea of sharing duties honestly and cooperatively instead of selecting an irrelevant visual detail. A summary should cover the whole material without exaggerating one person.

Example: Because all three groups take part, integrity can be summarised as a responsibility practised together.

pasangan kata ganda = 重叠词组合

题目规定第一项要完整重复词根，第二项要有规律的声音变化。逐项还原词根并分类，不要把部分重叠或比喻复合词混入。还要检查排列次序是否正确。

例子： 可先找带连字符且整个词根重复的形式，再配上固定韵律变化形式。

reduplication pair = pasangan kata ganda

The first item in the required pair must repeat its entire root, while the second must use an accepted rhythmic sound variation. Restore and classify each root instead of mixing in partial reduplication or figurative compounds. The stated order also matters.

Example: First identify a hyphenated full-root repetition, then pair it with a fixed rhythmic form.

pengajaran menepati janji = 守诺教训

题目把失信行为作为讽喻对象。应把它转成正面做法：履行承诺，并在确有困难时尽早诚实沟通。逃避或偷偷转嫁任务会重复同一诚信问题。

例子： 若无法按时完成，可提前说明原因、协商新安排并承担已答应的部分。

lesson about keeping promises = pengajaran menepati janji

The seloka criticises failure to carry out a promise. Turn it into a positive practice by fulfilling commitments and communicating early and honestly when a genuine difficulty occurs. Avoidance or secretly shifting the task repeats the same integrity problem.

Example: If completion becomes impossible, explain the reason early, agree on a new arrangement, and remain responsible for the promised part.

pengukuhan Bab 5 = Bab 5 巩固

章末练习综合检查诚信主题下的论证、解释、建议、总结预测、文学表达和重叠词技能。重试时应回到相应教学屏说明资料线索与判断过程，而不是记住选项位置；能够把方法迁移到新的家庭、校园或社会情境，才表示真正掌握。

例子： 面对新的失物或公开资料情境，可先分清事实和责任，再提出有依据、可实行且尊重他人的行动。

Bab 5 reinforcement = pengukuhan Bab 5

The review combines argument, interpretation, suggestion, summary and prediction, literary expression, and reduplication across the integrity theme. After a retry, return to the matching teaching screen and explain the evidence and reasoning rather than memorising an option position. Transfer to a new home, school, or community situation shows genuine mastery.

Example: For a new found-property or public-information situation, separate facts and responsibilities before proposing a supported, workable, and respectful action.