Ulang Kaji 1
Data menunjukkan kasut beralur memerlukan jarak lebih pendek untuk berhenti di lantai basah. Apakah rumusan paling tepat?
rumusan bukti geseran = 摩擦证据总结
题目要求概括特定测试的结果,不能扩大到所有情况。先找测试对象、条件和观察结果,再选择只在证据范围内说明抓地关系的陈述;绝对保证或无关颜色都不符合。
例子: 总结可限定为“在这项湿地测试中”,保留实验适用范围。
summary of friction evidence = rumusan bukti geseran
The item asks for a summary within the limits of a particular test. Identify the object, condition, and observed result, then select a statement that explains grip without extending it to every situation. An absolute guarantee or unrelated colour claim is unsupported.
Example: A sound summary can include “in this wet-floor test” to preserve the scope of the evidence.
Ulang Kaji 2
Sumber digital memberikan dua ejaan berbeza bagi istilah teknologi. Apakah tindakan terbaik?
sahkan istilah digital = 核实数码术语
题目考查资料冲突时的查证方法。应优先使用权威词典或语言机构,再比较词性、语境和例句;外观喜好或随机交替都不能解决拼写准确性问题。
例子: 可记录查询来源和日期,确认标准拼写后在整篇作品中保持一致。
verify a digital term = sahkan istilah digital
The item tests verification when digital sources disagree. Consult an authoritative dictionary or language institution and compare word class, context, and examples. Visual preference or random alternation cannot resolve spelling accuracy.
Example: Record the source and access date, confirm the standard spelling, and use it consistently throughout the work.
Ulang Kaji 3
Cadangan manakah paling sesuai untuk bekas minuman kanak-kanak yang mudah tumpah?
cadangan reka bentuk = 设计建议
题目要求方案直接回应容易倾倒的问题,并包含使用者测试。先看改动是否减少泄漏或改善握持,再检查是否由目标儿童实际试用;装饰环境或忽略问题都没有处理功能需求。
例子: 锁盖可控制泄漏,合适把手则需通过不同手型的儿童测试确认。
design recommendation = cadangan reka bentuk
The item asks for a solution that directly addresses spilling and includes user testing. Check whether the change reduces leakage or improves handling and whether target children actually try it. Decorating the surroundings or ignoring the problem does not meet the functional need.
Example: A locking lid controls leakage, while handle suitability should be tested with children who have different hand sizes.
Ulang Kaji 4
Ayat aktif manakah sepadan dengan “Model itu diuji oleh pasukan inovasi”?
padankan ayat aktif = 配对主动句
题目要求把被动句恢复成主动句,并保持施事者、动作和对象不变。先找由 oleh 引出的执行者,再把它放到句首;若模型变成执行测试的一方,事件角色已经颠倒。
例子: 可用“谁测试什么”快速核对转换前后的角色是否一致。
match an active sentence = padankan ayat aktif
The item requires a passive sentence to return to active form without changing the actor, action, or object. Identify the doer introduced by “oleh” and place it first. If the model becomes the tester, the event roles have been reversed.
Example: Use “who tested what” to verify that the roles remain consistent after transformation.
Ulang Kaji 5
Apakah gabungan maklumat yang paling kukuh untuk memilih prototaip?
证据式原型选择 = pemilihan prototaip berasaskan bukti
题目要求决定原型时使用多方面证据。应把使用者需求、测试表现、安全、成本和易用性一起比较,并说明标准权重;个人喜好、单一评论或名称长度不能代表整体适合度。
例子: 可制作评分表,让每个原型按相同标准接受比较,再记录选择理由。
evidence-based prototype selection = pemilihan prototaip berasaskan bukti
The item asks for several forms of evidence when choosing a prototype. Compare user needs, test performance, safety, cost, and usability, and explain how the criteria are weighted. Personal preference, one comment, or name length cannot represent overall suitability.
Example: Use a scoring table so every prototype is compared against the same criteria and the decision reason is recorded.
Ulang Kaji 6
Rangka manakah paling sesuai untuk laporan idea inovasi?
rangka laporan inovasi = 创新报告结构
题目寻找从问题到测试计划的连贯结构。报告应先界定使用者需要和证据,再提出多个方案、列出比较标准、说明选择并计划验证;装饰或随机故事无法让他人复核决策。
例子: 报告可附一张比较表,显示每个方案在安全、成本和易用性方面的表现。
innovation report outline = rangka laporan inovasi
The item asks for a coherent path from user problem to test plan. Define the need and evidence, generate alternatives, state comparison criteria, explain the selection, and plan validation. Decoration or random narrative does not allow others to review the decision.
Example: Include a comparison table showing how each option performs in safety, cost, and usability.
Pengukuhan Lengkap
Semua kemahiran utama Bab 7 telah disemak.
Kembali ke senarai babBab 7 巩固 = pengukuhan Bab 7
章末练习综合检查科学资料总结与预测、科技论证与查词、使用者建议、创新决策、多媒体推理、语态和语序。重试时要回到对应方法说明证据与语言理由,而不是记住选项位置;能迁移到新问题才算真正掌握。
例子: 面对新的校园工具问题,可先核实资料,再比较方案、选择句型并设计测试。
Bab 7 reinforcement = pengukuhan Bab 7
The review combines scientific summary and forecast, technology argument and word reference, user-centred recommendation, innovation decisions, multimedia reasoning, voice, and word order. After a retry, return to the matching method and explain the evidence or language reason instead of memorising an option position. Transfer to a new problem shows genuine mastery.
Example: For a new school-tool problem, verify information, compare alternatives, choose suitable language forms, and design a test.