unsur hujah kukuh = 有力论证要素

题目考查完整论证的组成。应同时有明确立场、相关证据、证据如何支持立场的解释，以及对限制的认识；重复口号或不断改变意见不能建立可信推理。

例子： 可用“主张—数据—解释—限制—结论”逐项检查一段科技评论。

elements of a strong argument = unsur hujah kukuh

The question tests the components of a complete argument. It should include a clear position, relevant evidence, an explanation of how the evidence supports the position, and recognition of limitations. Repeated slogans or shifting opinions cannot build credible reasoning.

Example: Check a technology review through position, data, explanation, limitation, and conclusion.

pilih makna mengikut konteks = 按语境选义

题目询问一词多义时的查证方法。应比较各释义的词性、搭配和例句，再看哪一项符合当前句子；释义长短或把互相冲突的意思混合都不是可靠方法。

例子： 查询 rangka 时，要看句子谈的是结构、骨架还是计划，再选择对应义项。

select meaning by context = pilih makna mengikut konteks

The item asks how to handle a word with multiple dictionary meanings. Compare word class, combinations, and examples, then select the meaning that fits the current sentence. Definition length or mixing incompatible meanings is not a reliable method.

Example: For “rangka,” determine whether the sentence concerns a structure, skeleton, or plan before selecting the entry.

cadangan mesra pengguna = 无障碍建议

题目要求建议能直接解决色觉辨识困难，并说明实施与测试。先看方案是否提供不依赖颜色的线索，再检查是否邀请目标使用者验证；模糊美化或让学生猜测都没有处理根本问题。

例子： 可为状态加图案与文字标签，并让色觉障碍学生试用后调整对比。

accessible design suggestion = cadangan mesra pengguna

The question asks for a suggestion that directly addresses colour-recognition difficulty and includes implementation and testing. Look for cues that do not depend on colour and validation with target users. Vague beautification or asking students to guess does not solve the underlying problem.

Example: Add patterns and text labels to status indicators, then refine contrast after trials with colour-blind learners.

mesej lagu teknologi = 科技歌词主题

题目要找能表达负责任使用科技的歌词。先辨认是否同时包含使用价值与安全意识，再考虑语言是否简洁、自然、适合歌唱；鼓励忽视资料安全的句子与主题相反。

例子： 一行歌词可把“善用工具”和“保护隐私”并列，形成清楚且容易记忆的信息。

technology song message = mesej lagu teknologi

The item asks for a lyric that communicates responsible technology use. Check whether it combines useful application with safety awareness and whether the wording is concise, natural, and singable. A line that encourages ignoring data safety contradicts the theme.

Example: A lyric can pair “use the tool well” with “protect privacy” to create a clear, memorable message.

tukar kepada ayat pasif = 转换被动句

题目要求把主动句改成被动句，并保持施事者、动作和受事者不变。先把承受动作的对象移到句首，动词改成 di- 形式，再用 oleh 引出施事者放在后面；如果施事者和受事者位置对调，事件角色就颠倒了。

例子： 可用“谁创造了什么”核对转换前后，再确认 oleh 后面的施事者仍是原来的人物。

convert to a passive sentence = tukar kepada ayat pasif

The item requires a voice change without changing event roles. Identify the actor, action, and receiver, move the receiver to the front, and adjust the verb. If the person and object exchange roles, the meaning has changed.

Example: Check “who created what” before and after the transformation and ensure the actor introduced by “oleh” remains the original person.

Unit 20 练习复盘 = ulang kaji Unit 20

完成练习后，检查论证是否同时说明好处、证据与限制；查词时要依据语境选择义项。建议必须具体且能测试，歌词要围绕同一主题；语态转换则逐一核对施事者、动作和受事者。

例子： 若应用按钮太小，可提出放大与语音提示并安排测试，而不是只说“让它更好”。

Unit 20 practice review = ulang kaji Unit 20

After practice, check that an argument explains benefit, evidence, and limitation and that dictionary meaning is selected by context. A recommendation must be specific and testable, lyrics must maintain one theme, and voice transformation requires the same actor, action, and receiver.

Example: For buttons that are too small, propose enlargement and voice guidance with user testing instead of merely saying “make it better.”.