asas ramalan eksperimen = 实验预测基础

题目询问预测之前要做的分析。应先比较多次结果，寻找重复趋势和可能的因果关系，再用谨慎语言预测；只挑喜欢的数据或修改数据都会破坏证据。

例子： 三次结果若方向一致，可把共同趋势作为预测依据，并注明仍需进一步测试。

basis for an experimental forecast = asas ramalan eksperimen

The question asks what analysis must happen before forecasting. Compare repeated results, identify a recurring pattern and possible cause-and-effect relationship, and then state a cautious prediction. Selecting only a favourite result or altering data would weaken the evidence.

Example: When three trials point in the same direction, use that shared trend while noting that further testing may still be needed.

tafsir petunjuk sains = 解读科学线索

题目要求从鞋底磨损、湿地和打滑的关系作解释。先找原句中的原因与结果，再选择能够说明抓地变化的含义；颜色或极端处置并没有文本依据。

例子： 可把“磨损”视为条件，“容易打滑”视为结果，再解释两者之间的摩擦关系。

interpret a science clue = tafsir petunjuk sains

The item requires an interpretation of the relationship among worn soles, a wet floor, and slipping. Identify the condition and result, then choose the meaning that explains the change in grip. Colour or an extreme action has no support in the sentence.

Example: Treat “worn” as the condition and “slips easily” as the result, then explain their relationship through friction.

pembuka pendapat = 观点开头

题目寻找同时表达立场和初步理由的开头。先检查句子是否明确说明作者主张，再看理由是否与雨天安全相关；零散词语或没有根据的保证都不能引出完整论证。

例子： 好的开头可先主张减速，后续再用湿路抓地和制动距离补充证据。

opening an opinion paragraph = pembuka pendapat

The question asks for an opening that states a position and introduces a relevant reason. Check whether the writer clearly says what should happen and connects it to wet-weather safety. Fragments or an unsupported guarantee cannot begin a reasoned paragraph.

Example: A strong opening may recommend slowing down, followed by evidence about grip and stopping distance.

rangka cerita sains = 科学故事框架

题目考查故事结构与科学探究是否连贯。应让角色先遇到问题，再观察、尝试并检验结果；只有术语列表或顺序混乱的片段无法形成有因果关系的故事。

例子： 角色发现冰块融化太快，可比较不同包裹材料，再以观察结果结束故事。

science story outline = rangka cerita sains

The question tests whether narrative structure and scientific inquiry work together. A character should face a problem, observe, try a solution, and evaluate the outcome. A vocabulary list or disordered fragments cannot create a coherent cause-and-effect story.

Example: A character noticing fast-melting ice can compare wrapping materials and end with the observed result.

kata perintah = 祈使词

题目要求找出带有祈使词的句子，也就是请别人去做某件事的句子。先看每句开头的词是在表达惊喜、伤心等感情，还是在提出请求或指示，再看句末标点是感叹号还是一般的句号。

例子： “Sila duduk”是礼貌邀请，“Jangan berlari”是禁止。

kata perintah = imperative word

The item asks for a sentence that uses an imperative word, meaning a sentence that asks someone to do something. Check whether the opening word expresses a feeling such as surprise or sadness, or makes a request or gives an instruction, and look at the end punctuation as a clue.

Example: “Sila duduk” is a polite invitation, and “Jangan berlari” is a prohibition.

Unit 19 练习复盘 = ulang kaji Unit 19

完成练习后，检查总结是否只涵盖已观察结果，预测是否以重复趋势为依据。解释必须能指出原文线索，观点段落要有完整论证，故事要有科学因果；句型判断则同时看目的、语气和标点。

例子： 湿地打滑资料可支持抓地解释，却不能保证所有鞋在所有环境都安全。

Unit 19 practice review = ulang kaji Unit 19

After practice, check that summaries stay within observed results and forecasts use a repeated trend. An interpretation must identify its textual clue, an opinion paragraph needs complete reasoning, a story needs scientific cause and effect, and sentence type depends on purpose, tone, and punctuation together.

Example: Wet-floor slipping evidence can support an explanation of grip but cannot guarantee every shoe in every condition.