soalan penilaian alat = 工具评价问题

题目要找能检验用途和安全证据的问题。应同时关注使用者问题、解决效果与测试依据；只问创作者喜好或主张不试用就选择，都无法支持负责任的决定。

例子： 可追问目标使用者、测试次数、风险和失败情况，再判断工具是否适合。

tool evaluation question = soalan penilaian alat

The item asks for a question that examines purpose and safety evidence. It should focus on the user problem, solution performance, and testing basis. Asking only about the creator’s preference or choosing without a trial cannot support a responsible decision.

Example: Ask about target users, test count, risks, and failures before judging whether the tool is suitable.

rumusan data multimedia = 多媒体数据总结

题目要求概括图表中连续四次的数据趋势。应陈述已观察到的变化，不把趋势夸大成绝对未来，也不能把图表颜色误当成原因；总结与预测必须分开。

例子： 四次能耗下降可总结效率提升，至于下一次是否继续下降则需要谨慎预测和新测试。

summary of multimedia data = rumusan data multimedia

The question asks for a summary of a trend shown across four trials. State the observed change without exaggerating it into an absolute future claim or treating graph colour as a cause. Keep the summary separate from any forecast.

Example: Four decreases can support improved energy efficiency, while the next result still requires a cautious forecast and another test.

catatan untuk inovasi = 创新笔记

题目寻找能支持后续生发方案的记录方式。有效笔记要保留使用者需求、问题、关键数据和来源，并用关键词方便比较；逐字抄写或把个人意见混成事实都会降低可追溯性。

例子： 可分栏写“来源事实、限制、问题、初步想法”，让资料与创意保持清楚。

notes for innovation = catatan untuk inovasi

The item asks for notes that support later idea generation. Useful notes preserve user needs, problems, key measurements, and sources in a form that is easy to compare. Copying everything or mixing personal opinion with source facts reduces traceability.

Example: Use separate columns for source facts, constraints, problems, and early ideas so evidence and invention remain distinct.

semakan kad Jawi = 爪夷文卡片检查

题目询问公开展示前的语言准确性检查。应核对罗马字原词、从右到左方向、字母连接和可靠来源；装饰尺寸与颜色可以之后决定，不能代替文字复核。

例子： 完成建筑名称卡后，可让教师逐字核对，再检查展示顺序是否清楚。

Jawi card verification = semakan kad Jawi

The item asks about language accuracy before public display. Verify the Rumi source, right-to-left direction, letter connections, and a reliable reference. Decoration size and colour may be chosen later but cannot replace linguistic checking.

Example: After completing a building-name card, ask a teacher to verify each word and then check that the display order is clear.

bina susunan songsang = 构建倒装句

题目要求把谓语提前，同时保持原句的主语、性质和程度。先划分“Reka bentuk itu”为主语，“amat praktikal”为谓语，再整体移动；打乱短语内部次序会破坏语法和意思。

例子： 转换时可先用括号标出两个成分，再把完整谓语放到完整主语之前。

build inverted order = bina susunan songsang

The item requires the predicate to move forward while preserving the original subject, quality, and degree. Separate “Reka bentuk itu” as subject and “amat praktikal” as predicate, then move the complete unit. Scrambling words inside either phrase damages grammar and meaning.

Example: Bracket the two components first, then place the intact predicate before the intact subject.

Unit 21 练习复盘 = ulang kaji Unit 21

完成练习后，确认问答资料已按标准用于决定，多媒体总结没有混入宣传猜测。笔记需保留来源并把新想法分开；Jawi 要经过可靠核实；倒装句必须移动完整成分而不打乱短语。

例子： 比较原型可用安全、成本和易用性评分；“amat praktikal”作为完整谓语可移到主语之前。

Unit 21 practice review = ulang kaji Unit 21

After practice, confirm that answers are compared against criteria and that multimedia summaries do not mix evidence with promotional guesses. Notes must preserve sources and separate new ideas, Jawi needs reliable verification, and inversion must move a complete component without scrambling its internal order.

Example: Score prototypes for safety, cost, and usability; move the complete predicate “amat praktikal” before the subject.